I'm a poet / essayist / memoirist/
journalist (in the sense of keeping a journal, not of working for a newspaper) and it occurred to me that a blog fits in with all that. If Montaigne, father of the essay, were alive today, he'd keep a blog. This is my self-portrait as frustrated artist who can't believe she's not famous yet. (And because it's part of my artistic endeavor, the whole damn thing is copyrighted. All rights reserved.)
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Categories

Archives

  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005

Recent Entries

  • Criminal Gila Monsters Riding Tractors and Eating Artichokes
  • You might want to put a bid on this one tonight, ladies and gentlemen, because we are talking to Phil Collins's people
  • Sunday So Far
  • Darling Lily
  • Even East Coast Super Lefties Think SLC Is WAY Cool
  • The Vamp Ass Buffy Really Kicks
  • Bore vs. Gore
  • The Priesthood is Magic
  • Stunted and Misshapen by the Priesthood
  • Men with First Names and Sweaty Palms

Recent Comments

  • holly on Wars Are Expensive, But Why Should They Be the Standard By Which Other Spending Is Judged?
  • rebecca on Wars Are Expensive, But Why Should They Be the Standard By Which Other Spending Is Judged?
  • Juti on Wars Are Expensive, But Why Should They Be the Standard By Which Other Spending Is Judged?

Read These

News Feeds


RSS1 | RSS2 | Atom

Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 4.261

Designed by

« Republican Legislators: Bad Faith Fire Fighters | Home | US Churches' Attempts to do SOMETHING About Gaza »

February 8, 2009

Wars Are Expensive, But Why Should They Be the Standard By Which Other Spending Is Judged?

One of the conservative arguments against the stimulus bill making its way through Congress is that it will "cost more than all the wars in US history."

Now, first of all, this is untrue. If you adjust the cost of World War II for inflation, it goes from $288 billion to somewhere around $3.6 trillion. (At least, that's what I learned from sites I found through Google. I didn't want to link to any of the sites providing these numbers, because they're mostly wacky right-wing platforms.)

Or, as this post from the Daily Kos explains, the "war on terror" has already cost more than the stimulus package--and it's not even over.

But what I want to point out is this:

saying, "the stimulus is going to cost more than any war has ever cost," can be paraphrased this way:

"We are going to spend more in an effort to heal our economy, begin to address the problems with our health care, provide for our children's education, feed the hungry, house the homeless, and repair and strengthen our crumbling infrastructure, than we ever ever spent to kill people."

Maybe it's just me, but I don't think that's so bad, and frankly I wish it were true.

I admit, I spend a lot more of my income on things like food, education, clothing, housing, transportation, etc, than I spend on killing, maiming and undermining my enemies.

I mean, what's YOUR budget for contract killings? How many soldiers do YOU employ to attack and protect you from your enemies?

We SHOULD spend more on investing in our own country and our own citizens than we spend killing other people in other countries, if you ask me.

Let's hope that we never again spend nearly as much waging war as we spend taking care of each other.

After all, that's what Jesus would do.

p.s. Also see this analysis from the Daily Kos demonstrating that the New Deal actually did work. An excerpt:

The oddest idea is that "putting the nation on a war footing" was the cure that finally ended the depression when the New Deal couldn't get the job done. It's something that gets repeated every time this tall tale is told, because even Republicans realize that the Great Depression did end. They just have to think of some way to give credit to something other than Democrats.... But if they really believe that wars are stimulating, you have to ask: why aren't we stimulated? We have two wars going on. We've invested lots of capital -- including the kind that lives, breathes, and has family -- but that doesn't seem to be shooting the GDP skyward. Maybe Republicans think we need to take on a bigger target. Would a war with Iran get the stimulus working? Or is this stimulus more China-sized?

Posted by holly at February 8, 2009 3:18 PM

3 Comments

By Juti on February 8, 2009 11:00 PM

Right ON, Holly. I've been shouting similar things at my radio all week.

I keep hearing Republicans leaders being quoted, saying things like "The Democrats are going to cost us money." Oh, yeah, tell me that nobody spent the nation's money like a lot of drunken sailors for the past eight years, when Republicans had it all their way?!

Exasperating. For such a lot of self-proclaimed Christians, I can't see any Christian teaching being put to use. "By their fruits you shall know them." Harumph. I don't think you can call war a fruit.

We should be proud to be spending more on healing, as you put it, than on war - not shamed by it.

You are soooo right.

By rebecca on February 9, 2009 7:44 AM

Jon Stewart talked about this on the Daily Show the other day - he showed a clip of some Republican (senator? Something like that) who was giving a presentation about the stimulus bill. The guy said, "If you took the money and piled it on top of each other in $100 bills, it would be almost 39 miles high!" And Jon Stewart said something like, "I don't think that's what they're planning on doing with it..."

It's just like what they did with terrorism and gay marriage - try to distract everyone from what's really going on by playing on fear.

By holly on February 22, 2009 9:30 AM

R & J--I know I'm not the only person saying this, but sometimes it seems like there aren't very many of us. Amazing how easy we are to drown out.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.