I'm a poet / essayist / memoirist/
journalist (in the sense of keeping a journal, not of working for a newspaper) and it occurred to me that a blog fits in with all that. If Montaigne, father of the essay, were alive today, he'd keep a blog. This is my self-portrait as frustrated artist who can't believe she's not famous yet. (And because it's part of my artistic endeavor, the whole damn thing is copyrighted. All rights reserved.)
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Categories

Archives

  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005

Recent Entries

  • Criminal Gila Monsters Riding Tractors and Eating Artichokes
  • You might want to put a bid on this one tonight, ladies and gentlemen, because we are talking to Phil Collins's people
  • Sunday So Far
  • Darling Lily
  • Even East Coast Super Lefties Think SLC Is WAY Cool
  • The Vamp Ass Buffy Really Kicks
  • Bore vs. Gore
  • The Priesthood is Magic
  • Stunted and Misshapen by the Priesthood
  • Men with First Names and Sweaty Palms

Recent Comments

  • Holly on Why the F**k Is This Story About American Greed in the British Press?
  • Juti on Why the F**k Is This Story About American Greed in the British Press?

Read These

News Feeds


RSS1 | RSS2 | Atom

Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 4.261

Designed by

« The Neo-Con VP Battles | Home | The God Off »

October 19, 2008

Why the F**k Is This Story About American Greed in the British Press?

This story in the Guardian, about how a TENTH of the $700 billion bailout for Wall Street is being spent on payouts for the people who brought us the bank failure, PISSED ME OFF for so many reasons I can't name them all.

I recently had to listen to a Mormon woman who has voted Republican for 50 years complain about the way these horrible rich bankers and stock brokers are taking these massive payouts, and retiring. I wanted to say, "Why are you complaining? This is the trickle-down principle in action. This is what you've endorsed and voted for all your life." But I didn't.

It enrages me that the Republican party is identified as the party of Christianity, when in fact the Republican party is one of the least Christian organizations on the earth. Few other entities are so unapologetically devoted to helping the already rich amass and protect even greater wealth; few entities have such indifference to the people Jesus Christ said we should help: the needy, the poor, the sick.

I guess the American press is as scared as I am to point out to "good Mormons" and "good Republicans" how full of shit they are, how responsible they are for this mess, how our government still lets the robber barons steal from the poor and run off to England to drink fine wine and eat partridge, while the rest of us are supposed to eat... not cake but something off the McDonald's dollar menu.

The thing about karma and chickens coming home to roost is that it doesn't affect a single person. The country has karma, and it's biting us on the butt. But we've worked hard to ensure that some people are protected as much as possible from the consequences of their actions. The country as a whole has to deal with its karma, but just as wealth is not evenly distributed, neither is suffering.

I won't go so far as to say that the Republican party is dedicated to the creation of suffering; that's not its explicit goal. Instead, it merely pursues policies--military aggression, handouts to the wealthy, marginalizing and demonizing minorities--that cannot but help create suffering. What the Republican party is dedicated to, at least for the past ten years or so, is ensuring that when suffering occurs, it's the poor and the weak who suffer more than the rich and powerful.

It's done a heck of a job. I just hope it chooses a new goal.

Posted by holly at October 19, 2008 9:21 AM

2 Comments

By Juti on October 19, 2008 4:16 PM

Don't bet on it. The Rethug party has been developing in this direction since its inception.

By Holly on October 19, 2008 4:33 PM

Yeah, you're probably right, Juti--but I was trying to hold out the benefit of the doubt. After all, this is the party most of my family supports.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.