I'm a poet / essayist / memoirist/
journalist (in the sense of keeping a journal, not of working for a newspaper) and it occurred to me that a blog fits in with all that. If Montaigne, father of the essay, were alive today, he'd keep a blog. This is my self-portrait as frustrated artist who can't believe she's not famous yet. (And because it's part of my artistic endeavor, the whole damn thing is copyrighted. All rights reserved.)
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Categories

Archives

  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005

Recent Entries

  • Criminal Gila Monsters Riding Tractors and Eating Artichokes
  • You might want to put a bid on this one tonight, ladies and gentlemen, because we are talking to Phil Collins's people
  • Sunday So Far
  • Darling Lily
  • Even East Coast Super Lefties Think SLC Is WAY Cool
  • The Vamp Ass Buffy Really Kicks
  • Bore vs. Gore
  • The Priesthood is Magic
  • Stunted and Misshapen by the Priesthood
  • Men with First Names and Sweaty Palms

Recent Comments

  • Reese W. on Lousy Ticket Sales the Fault of Female Actors
  • rebecca on Lousy Ticket Sales the Fault of Female Actors
  • The Stenz on Lousy Ticket Sales the Fault of Female Actors
  • Gifted Typist on Lousy Ticket Sales the Fault of Female Actors
  • Juti on Lousy Ticket Sales the Fault of Female Actors

Read These

News Feeds


RSS1 | RSS2 | Atom

Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 4.261

Designed by

« Systematic Rape on an Unprecedented Scale | Home | I Wish Bush's Claque Would Spontaneously Dehisce »

October 9, 2007

Lousy Ticket Sales the Fault of Female Actors

OK, I know lately I've been relying heavily on the "here's a link to something upsetting we should all pay attention to" form of blogging, but the fact of the matter is, here's a link to something upsetting we should all pay attention to. Turns out that Warner Bros is going to stop making movies with women in the lead, because two recent vehicles for big-name stars (The Brave One, with Jodie Foster, and The Invasion, with Nicole Kidman), didn't earn much at the box office.

I admit I didn't see either movie, and don't plan to, but it wasn't because I don't like movies with women in them; it's because both movies looked to me like the scripts sucked.

Did I just make this up out of nothing, or did Erin Brockovich do pretty well at the box office? Chicago? Chocolat? Most every Austen adaptation, whether I liked it or not?

This points to a problem that has been noted with regards to reading audiences: women will read books about men, but men won't read books about women, so books about men are emphasized, even though women make up a larger share of book buyers and readers than men do. Apparently the same applies to movies, and now women will have to even fewer movies about women to watch. They'll just have to settle for more movies about men, because some men won't see movies about women--or even make them.

Thank the powers that be, once again, for the likes of Joss Whedon, L. Frank Baum and Lewis Carroll. And I for one shall boycott all Warner Bros films, even on Netflix--I'm just not going to support that shit.

Posted by holly at October 9, 2007 12:29 PM

5 Comments

By Juti on October 9, 2007 5:56 PM

The fact that the films sucked had nothing to do with the box office returns, I'm sure. Perhaps it would be instructive to compare how many film flops had main male characters versus how many had female main characters, over a longer period of time, say the past forty years? That might be a better basis of comparison, eh?

By Gifted Typist on October 10, 2007 5:10 PM

Haven't seen either flick, but it's pretty lame to blame it on the female actors. They must be getting desperate for scapegoats

By The Stenz on October 15, 2007 5:52 PM

That is just unbelievable. I wish I could say I would boycott Warner Bros. too, but I frankly don't believe boycotts work, and I really do not pay that much attention to the film company I pay attention to films I am interested in. I admit I was not really interested in either of these, and it has nothing to do with the leads who are both impressive actors. It sounds like an excuse. Hopefully they have people looking through blogs like these and realize their stupidity.

By rebecca on October 15, 2007 6:09 PM

That's so lame. I'm pretty sure both movies got terrible reviews, which I was sad about because I like Jodie Foster and totally wanted to see The Brave One (until I read said reviews). I did see The Invasion, and mostly enjoyed it in all its awful glory. I think Warner Brothers will come around when they realize their lame movies with male leads do just as badly.

By Reese W. on October 23, 2007 12:07 AM

I think those movies probably flopped because Jodie Foster and Nicole Kidman are kinda yesterday's news, not because they're chicks.

It's always bugged me the way that movies about women are considered "chick flicks," but movies about men are just considered normal movies, made for both men and women to enjoy.

The only exception I can think of to that would be the "Kill Bill" movies. Men love 'em/Women love 'em. I think Tarantino did something very clever there.

p.s. Hey, Holly!

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.