I'm a poet / essayist / memoirist/
journalist (in the sense of keeping a journal, not of working for a newspaper) and it occurred to me that a blog fits in with all that. If Montaigne, father of the essay, were alive today, he'd keep a blog. This is my self-portrait as frustrated artist who can't believe she's not famous yet. (And because it's part of my artistic endeavor, the whole damn thing is copyrighted. All rights reserved.)
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Categories

Archives

  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005

Recent Entries

  • Criminal Gila Monsters Riding Tractors and Eating Artichokes
  • You might want to put a bid on this one tonight, ladies and gentlemen, because we are talking to Phil Collins's people
  • Sunday So Far
  • Darling Lily
  • Even East Coast Super Lefties Think SLC Is WAY Cool
  • The Vamp Ass Buffy Really Kicks
  • Bore vs. Gore
  • The Priesthood is Magic
  • Stunted and Misshapen by the Priesthood
  • Men with First Names and Sweaty Palms

Recent Comments

  • Sister Mary Lisa on An Obvious Compound Word
  • Holly on An Obvious Compound Word
  • Sister Mary Lisa on An Obvious Compound Word
  • Janet Kincaid on An Obvious Compound Word
  • Hattie on An Obvious Compound Word

Read These

News Feeds


RSS1 | RSS2 | Atom

Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 4.261

Designed by

« An Enthusiastic Passenger of the Latest Bandwagon I'm Aboard | Home | New to My Collection »

September 12, 2006

An Obvious Compound Word

Today one of my students gave me a poem built in part on questioning something I apparently said about heartbreak.

When I first got home from my mission I was suffering from what I would eventually come to call religious despair. On my mission I was suicidally depressed, though I lacked the initiative and the energy to do anything about my grief. I could not eat or sleep. I wept uncontrollably for nine weeks, so bereft that I could not stop my tears even in public.

And then I finished my mission, went home, and went back to work on my undergraduate degree. I was young and pretty and from a middle-class family. I liked wearing bright blue mascara and clean clothes. I still attended church. My suffering did not involve addiction or physical violence.

And so no one believed me when I talked about my unhappiness. God forbid I try to write a poem about the despair I had experienced! I remember a middle-aged gay male bartender responding with undisguised loathing to a poem I submitted in class attempting to describe the young, chaste, female trauma I'd endured. How dare I, he proclaimed! How dare I believe I knew anything of heartbreak!

And now that I am middle-aged, a young man is saying basically the same thing, because.... I can pay my own mortgage? Because there's still no addiction and physical violence in my life?

OK, I don't know a thing about heartbreak. I know nothing of it. I relinquish any claim to so dignified a word. What I know--all I know--is grief's assault on the rest of the body. If you want to talk about suffering rooted in and expressed through phlegm and bile and blood and bowels, then hey, I have something to say about that.

Posted by holly at September 12, 2006 11:59 PM

5 Comments

By Hattie on September 13, 2006 4:17 AM

I have never let anyone silence me. Don't you let anyone silence you. Go back to your long postings. Say what you think. Just because you are female and middle class doesn't mean you don't have feelings, and strong ones at that! And furthermore that you can express those feelings in poetry.
And be sure to tell people who want to give you a hard time that they are full of shit. They are probably just jealous because they can't write poetry like yours.
You can tell them that from me.

By Janet Kincaid on September 13, 2006 9:30 PM

I always love it when other people presume to know my heart and the depth of my hurt or heartbreak or whatever adjective you want to use to describe the emotions we each feel individually.

What this young man and the gay bartender lack is empathy. I can never KNOW how someone feels, but I can certainly UNDERSTAND and appreciate those feelings because I've had feelings, too. And I certainly wouldn't want someone to judge something I personally felt and experienced. Perhaps you should ask your student if he knows what empathy is and if he might not be a bit less judgmental and a bit more generous in allowing that FOR YOU, your feelings are genuine and valid.

I agree with Hattie: don't let this kid silence you.

By Sister Mary Lisa on September 14, 2006 6:22 PM

I think even if you did tell those two guys they are full of shit, they won't care. People like them tend to be unable to view anyone else with empathy or sympathy because it's all about them and their feelings, and nobody else matters. It's sad, really. Your feelings do matter. Your heartbreak is just as valid as theirs.

By Holly on September 15, 2006 8:44 AM

Hi Everyone--thanks for the support, but you don't need to worry about my letting anyone silence me. I wrote the post in pique and defiance, not submission and acquiesence. It's a technique I've found fairly successful: if someone declares a particular term or rhetorical strategy off-limits, I can often just substitute another, preferrably one that's stronger/ more aggressive. If somone tells me I can't talk about righteousness (because only people who go to church are righteous), I say, "Fine, then I'll talk about ethics." If someone says I have no right to talk heartbreak, I'm willing to talk instead, as I say, about what grief does to the rest of the body. Heartbreak is a very polite euphemism compared to a frank discussion of the physical symptoms of severe depression. I don't lose much by ceding those terms.

Of course, there are other terms and rhetorical strategies I am not willing to give up, and if someone tells me I can't use them, I just say, "Fuck you."

What's most interesting to me is that at times, no matter what vocabulary I use, what I say just doesn't register with some audiences. I always find it remarkable. Not quite sure what to do it about--not quite sure I care even to do much. But it's interesting.

And by the way, my posts have gotten shorter not because I feel censored or censured, but because I'm very, very busy.

By Sister Mary Lisa on September 15, 2006 3:32 PM

Exactly, it won't register as they can't see beyond themselves or their own experiences. Sad.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.